I love you.
On Apr 1, 2011, at 5:34 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: > Marsha, > Tell me something (useful) that I don't know. > Ian > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:32 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Ian, >> >> On Mar 31, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Arlo Bensinger wrote: >> >>> "In fact, when proposed that I could perhaps interpret ZMM and Lila in a >>> way different from some, this was also met with incredulity. Any good book >>> has multiple interpretations, and nobody has rights to the correct >>> interpretation." (Marsha) >> >> >> >> This quote is not something I ever stated. Arlo is mistaken when >> citing me at its source. Another 'oops' mistake. >> >> >> >> Marsha >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------- >> >> On Apr 1, 2011, at 4:59 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote: >> >>> Arlo, Mark, Mary, Marsha, DMB, >>> >>> Mary called it an "entre" I call it between a rock and hard place. >>> >>> Mark said to Arlo "Get a grip". >>> I have to say I've had that sentiment in this (and similar) thread for a >>> while. >>> >>> And the others interpreted each others quotes. thus : >>> >>> Arlo quoted Marsha: >>> "In fact, when proposed that I could perhaps interpret ZMM and Lila in >>> a way different from some, this was also met with incredulity. Any >>> good book has multiple interpretations, and nobody has rights to the >>> correct interpretation." >>> Arlo said: >>> ... I think a sentiment like "it's all interpretation" is readily >>> evident. In a world where nobody has rights to the correct >>> interpretation, please tell me how Ron's "interpretation" of Pirsig's >>> MOQ supporting rape and torture would be dismissed? >>> >>> dmb says: >>> I guess Marsha thinks that interpretive freedom means never having to >>> answer any criticism. It means you don't have to worry about making >>> sense. Imagine how much work that would save! How how lonely that >>> would be. >>> >>> Ian says, I just want to bring this debate up a level, it's all so >>> interpersonal, and as Mary suggests you have to question people's >>> motives in the twisted sarcsasm before even looking at the words and >>> the subject matter. >>> >>> Ian >>> What's so funny 'bout .... >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Mary <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hello Arlo, >>>> >>>> Pretty late for me on a 'school' night, but your excellent post deserves a >>>> response - quickly. >>>> >>>> [Mary] >>>> I disagree with your interpretation of Bo's interpretation. >>>> >>>> [Arlo] >>>> I can tell by this start, that we are going to be in a big disagreement. >>>> This sort of "everything is interpretation" type thinking (and no, that is >>>> not a quote of anyone) is really faulty, and I argue is very stuck in pure >>>> subjectivism. >>>> >>>> [Mary now] >>>> Of course it is stuck in subjectivism. Absolutely! Remember, I am one who >>>> thinks the Intellectual Level is SOM all the way, for all of us, all the >>>> time. I happen to think that anyone unwilling to admit that is kidding >>>> themselves - and I see you, DMB, Andre, and Dan kidding yourselves daily >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
