So Arlo, can I suggest reading the post I made a couple of hours ago - which was not about you in particular, ... but you provide us with an example here:
In this particular case, do you think that maybe the reason you made the mistake in interpreting who had said what, was that you were motivated to find fault in Marsha more so than the words ? Ian On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR <[email protected]> wrote: > [Arlo] > No, this is a verbatim quote from my email archives of a post you made to the > list. There is no "oops", well, maybe in your denying you said this, but > anyone > with half a brain can search the archives and find it. > > [Arlo adds] > Marsha has brought to my intention that I am wrong, that is this a quote of > Mark's. I apologize, as I was reading the archives all the embedded >>>> lost > track of who was saying what. > > Of course, maybe I should just say that its my "interpretation" that Marsha > said this, and this is just as valid as her "interpretation" that she did not. > > Who is anyone else to force "static constraints" on me, you want to kill > Dynamic Quality, don't you? > > Arlo the Less-Than-Half-Brained. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
