[Ian] ... do you think that maybe the reason you made the mistake in interpreting who had said what, was that you were motivated to find fault in Marsha more so than the words ?
[Arlo] After repeated accusations of malicious quoting on my part, of saying that I was misrepresenting her ideas on "interpretation", I had given her several opportunties to clarify, so in response to yet another claim I searched, too quickly I see now, for "Marsha" and "interpretation" in my archives. Bear in mind, though, that I was also arguing against Mark, and did include his words as well, so I was not singling out any one person to find fault with, so that this quote is attributed to Mark instead of Marsha doesn't change that I've been arguing with them both. I'll accept chastizing for this error, but I will ask the question of Marsha again, if she does NOT think that all interpretations are equally valid, then how does she propose we discriminate among them? If I am wrong, as she's suggested, that she does not think "its all interpretation", then how does she parse out what is and what is not "interpretation". She keeps complaining that I am wrong about her, but refuses to answer simply questions to clarify herself. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
