A couple of points and a few sub-points to boot: 1) It is not "oops". It is ( OOPS! ).
1a) Optionally it may be ( WHOOPS! ). 1b) You may check the archives if you do not believe me. 1c) You may not steal my line without permission. 2) Stop checking the archives. Shake the dust from your eyebrows. Spring is here and life is to be had. ~Frank ________________________________ From: ARLO J BENSINGER JR <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, April 1, 2011 4:45:47 AM Subject: Re: [MD] [Bulk] Re: MOQ and Completeness Theories (Sorry, Godel.) [Arlo] No, this is a verbatim quote from my email archives of a post you made to the list. There is no "oops", well, maybe in your denying you said this, but anyone with half a brain can search the archives and find it. [Arlo adds] Marsha has brought to my intention that I am wrong, that is this a quote of Mark's. I apologize, as I was reading the archives all the embedded >>>> lost track of who was saying what. Of course, maybe I should just say that its my "interpretation" that Marsha said this, and this is just as valid as her "interpretation" that she did not. Who is anyone else to force "static constraints" on me, you want to kill Dynamic Quality, don't you? Arlo the Less-Than-Half-Brained. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
