No worries Arlo, it was a rhetorical question. Believe me I've seen the dynamics of the interpretations on top of interpretations, and every position from absolute rights to subjective relativism to what is good / better. Quite amusing actually.
I guess I'm just pleading for people to take a deep breath before hurling criticisms and sarcasm (and malicious accusations as you put it), and think what it is they're arguing about, and most importantly why - motivations. Marsha's no angel, but it takes at least two accuse and defend with counter accusations. It's difficult for people to answer what might look to one "side" to be a straight question, when it us blindingly apparent that neither trusts the other. I've probably said enough. What's so funnt 'bout ... ? Ian On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:34 PM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR <[email protected]> wrote: > [Ian] > ... do you think that maybe the reason you made the mistake in interpreting > who > had said what, was that you were motivated to find fault in Marsha more so > than > the words ? > > [Arlo] > After repeated accusations of malicious quoting on my part, of saying that I > was misrepresenting her ideas on "interpretation", I had given her several > opportunties to clarify, so in response to yet another claim I searched, too > quickly I see now, for "Marsha" and "interpretation" in my archives. > > Bear in mind, though, that I was also arguing against Mark, and did include > his > words as well, so I was not singling out any one person to find fault with, so > that this quote is attributed to Mark instead of Marsha doesn't change that > I've been arguing with them both. > > I'll accept chastizing for this error, but I will ask the question of Marsha > again, if she does NOT think that all interpretations are equally valid, then > how does she propose we discriminate among them? If I am wrong, as she's > suggested, that she does not think "its all interpretation", then how does she > parse out what is and what is not "interpretation". > > She keeps complaining that I am wrong about her, but refuses to answer simply > questions to clarify herself. > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
