DMB,
I know, but that's about you and your position.

My position is consistent and clearly context dependent.

Ian
What's so funny 'bout ...

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:35 PM, david buchanan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ian said to dmb:
>
> Yes, I do, [think reductionism is the epitome of amoral scientific 
> objectivity] which is why the point you snipped was followed (and preceded) 
> by several buts and conditions ...
>
>
> dmb says:
> Yea, I certainly noticed your buts and conditions. But surely you realize by 
> now that I really, really hate that kind of equivocation. You're not being 
> subtle or nuanced, which would be fine. You're just being a wishy-washy 
> weasel. What don't you take a position and stick to it, for once. Your 
> efforts to be on every side of every issue does not help at all. It's drivel. 
> It's far more egotistical than intellectual and in fact it almost always 
> confuses and blurs whatever the topic or issue is.
> Sorry, but that's how I feel. I just hate it. How many years have I been 
> complaining about that, Ian? Not hours, days, weeks or months. Years. WTF?
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to