Hi Ian,

> What's wrong with reductionism ? It has diminishing value. Ever more
> precisely defined objects in smaller and smaller contexts, which lose
> sight of the fact that the patterns and unpatterned whole are more
> valuable than those well defined objects.

I think that reductionism applies to more than just objects and while it may 
have diminishing value it is still valuable. Especially when looking at 
something as fundamental as: "Is art Dynamic Quality or isn't it?" In my view 
such a question strikes at the heart of what Dynamic Quality is not. 

To reduce something to parts of something is basically an act of creating 
static quality and while Dynamic Quality is fundamental, static quality is 
still valuable. What do you think?

> (Incidentally whilst I don't subscribe to Ham's essentialism, I
> effectively agreed with him there in that I had already said DQ could
> be seen as a term for the undefined - or the unpatterned - to answer
> your specific additional question. So, no DQ, is not a pattern.)
> 
> Can I "define" my answers ?
> Yes I could, but no I can't.
> An answer is what is given when you ask a question.
> That's a definition, but not much use I suspect.
> Why the fixation with definition ?

Because everything is a definition. By my writing these words now I am defining 
out this post to MD.  All intellectual static quality is really just one 
definition after another.

> I'm losing the will to take your further questioning seriously, since
> you obviously know the answers to your own questions - so I need to
> know where you're headed with this. What's the point - where's the
> value ?
> 
> Ian

Where's the value? While it may appear that I know the answers to these 
questions, and yes I have my own ideas about them, and even about your 
potential ideas; I have no real way of knowing what will come out of your mouth 
until you have spoken. Maybe your ideas are better than mine? This is the 
creative discussion that is MD. 
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to