On Apr 14, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Arlo Bensinger wrote: > [Marsha] > They are both static value, on what basis are you differentiating? You > point doesn't make sense to me from a MoQ perspective. > > [Arlo] > On the same basis I differentiate between "Arlo says" and "The chair says". > One speaks, one does not.
Marsha: The chair does not represent an intellectual static pattern of value. > [Arlo] > Yes, "The MOQ" and "Pirsig" are both patterns of value. But this does not > mean the both say things. Speaking is a static pattern of value interrelated to the collection of patterns named "Pirsig. The understanding of a person being a collection of static patterns of value needs some investigation. Go and comprehend... > [Marsha] > Conventionally, the MoQ speaks to me. It did from the first time I read LILA. > > [Arlo] > Figuratively, the MOQ spoke to you. Conventionally, it was Pirsig speaking. Marsha: Figuratively? You're stretching... ;-) > [Marsha] > Your interpretive legitimacy argument seemed like a red herring to me. I > have no dog in that circus act. > > [Arlo] > If only that were true. Marsha: It is conventionally true. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
