Hi Andre, I am not sure if a Zen Buddhist would laugh at this. I would phrase the counter argument a little bit differently, but with what I think is the same intention.
1. Choice is a component of our reality 2. Natural selection at work is an expression of dynamic quality. 3. There is a sensed vector within dynamic quality which we call "betterness". Cheers, Mark On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Andre Broersen <[email protected]> wrote: > Ron to Ham and Dan: > > The counter argument I make > > 1: Choice is reality, every last bit > > 2. Dynamic Quality is natural selection at work > > 3.Dynamic Quality is best understood as "betterness" > > Andre: > Ron, are you just saying this to counter the argument or is this your idea > about DQ? > > I really think a Zen Buddhist will laugh at this...and perhaps Pirsig as > well. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
