Ron to Ham and Dan:
The counter argument I make
1: Choice is reality, every last bit
2. Dynamic Quality is natural selection at work
3.Dynamic Quality is best understood as "betterness"
Andre:
Ron, are you just saying this to counter the argument or is this your idea
about
DQ?
I really think a Zen Buddhist will laugh at this...and perhaps Pirsig as well.
Ron:
Perhaps Andre perhaps, But I believe the master as well as Bob would agree.
For arguements sake, lets see what the consequences are to take Quality as
each were to be true.
I would like all who care, weigh in on this, and see what we can come up with.
Pick a point of view consistent with your own view and explain how and why
your reasons are better than the other.
I think Pirsig means DQ is undefined betterness, the undefined good. This is
the
point of view I wish to defend.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
