This weekends MD had a high quality and I just want to thank all contributors for good and amusing reading.

The mail from Marilyn Davenport woke me up this morning and reminded me about that this is still a serious matter for many people.

The difference between social and intellectual values is important to understand because the free will is connected with this as I see it.

A prisoner in a system is not free to leave the system. A prisoner in a jail is not free to move, the space where he can choose to move is limited. A prisoner in a culture or religious system is not free to choose standpoint. A person who is free to think and choose his standpoint has an unlimited space of intellectual possibilities. Freedom is a space of possibilities.

Renassaince is a typical outbreak for intellectual forces, leaving the social values behind in favour of the scientific stars.

Democracy is another, leaving clans and tyrans behind in favour of polls and measurable election systems.

Static intellectual quality and patterns are measurable while dynamic quality is not measurable. Poor positivists left in the fog of measurelessness.

For a free democracy to work in reality it has to be commonly understood the difference between the social and the intellectual level. Those who don't understand the difference are not free. They are afraid. They are isolated by their own lack of distance.

Who will be responsible for maintaining the infrastructure of the intellectual level?

better

Jan-Anders
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to