Hi Joe, I prefer the notion that evolution follows free will. I have a problem with placing things under the theories of evolution. Quality does not evolve, since such a concept makes Quality subservient to evolution; as if Quality has to follow certain rules. Quality begets evolution. Certainly one can see reality through the prism of evolution, but this does not work for me. I find it too aggrandizing.
Cheers, Mark On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Free will follows evolution. I see evolution as levels in existence. Free > will indicates that existence is not individuated, and not indeterminate. > That is why I see reality in levels in existence, evolution. > > Joe > > > On 4/18/11 11:06 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > <snip> >> Free will can be considered a personal choice, although there are >> those who claim we have been determined to believe in free will. On >> the other hand we are free to choose determinism. The latter is like >> electing a ruler who changes the constitution so that he never leaves >> power, the other is more like an ever changing democracy, so long as >> one side does not take complete control. >> >> Me, I choose free will. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
