Past is a static pattern. As static as they come! What is more unchanging than the past?
But the future? We use the word to point to something that brings into being, but our imagining is never fully the reality we actually experience. The future as an idea is one thing, but the future as a thing is too mysterious for words, and just like I've always thought of DQ, in every way. What is evolution but the drive toward the future? Try it. Go back and substitute the concept of the future, for all references to DQ in Lila, and show me one that doesn't fit. It even works better with Jamesian pragmatism - what is the test of the good? Future experience. John past On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:15 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi John, > > Time, past and future, are static patterns. > > http://www.quantonics.com/Anthony_McWatts_MoQ_Paper.html > > Or try Nagarjuna's MMK. > > > Marsha > > > > > > On Apr 19, 2011, at 4:35 PM, John Carl wrote: > > > So, is DQ just another word for the future? And sq a term for the past? > Is > > that all there is to it after all this time? > > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
