Ron to Andre:

But I still fail to see how Dans point of how static patterns having no choice, 
and no freedom as it directly applies to the traditional philosophical problem 
of freewill vs. determinism, that MoQ renders moot,forms the general elementary 
framework of how static patterns of quality are understood within THE MoQ.

If you can provide some insight I'd be appreciative.

Andre:
Hi Ron, I'll do my best but must first say that I also, as Dan, don't quite 
understand why you do not grasp the MOQ perspective on this issue of freewill 
vs determinism.

Let's start slowly: you say you fail to see how following static patterns means 
'having no choice' in the context of f vs d in the MOQ renders it 'moot'... .

Are you with me thus far? Following static patterns simply means following what 
has gone thus far. There are a zillion static patterns to follow and 
...YES...you have a choice about those...following whichever ones you would 
like. Our culture freely offers these opportunities as wonderful expressions 
of... . But is this an expression of freewill? Is this an expression of freedom?

I think that, within the context of the MOQ Pirsig renders these choices, as 
expressing freedom or freewill to be rather empty...meaningless. He debunks the 
SOM inspired freedom to be meaningless... empty.
The choices you make, and the reasoning by which and through which you make 
these choices, in other words; the givens and the relations between those gives 
are already static. As soon as a choice is made, the choice is not dynamic but 
static. It is a static choice. I would say that most of our lives are spent 
making static choices. Go to the supermarket, walk the street, plan a vacation 
you have not undertaken before, apply for a job... and invariably the thing 
comes down to evoking prior,well established patterns to follow. Of course you 
have a choice about which (well established patterns) you choose (and my point 
to Ham was that this is, in the Western world understood as free choice and 
freewill). But Pirsig gets away from this. He suggests that this is NOT 
freewill nor free choice in the true sense in which the MOQ means it.

The MOQ is not a social value based apology for this type of stuff. The MOQ is 
a mystical philosophy. It wants to move us away from this intellectual stuff. 
What it says is, if you want true freedom, true free choice, kill all 
intellectual patterns whilst sustaining ( which in the Dutch translation of 
LILA is a little different as it implies a 'putting up with' a 'suffering') 
biological and social patterns).

All clinging to intellectual stuff impedes the realization of 'true' knowledge, 
unitive knowledge, DQ and I suggest that any allusion to 'freewill, 'freedom' 
are fetters and attempts of the ego, of selfishness, to assert itself over and 
over again. Pirsig, and Dan have been repeating this again and again:

To the extent that one's behaviour is controlled by static patterns of quality 
it is without choice'.

Choice as an expression of freedom i.e Dynamic choice. No...it is static 
choice... i.e. based on static patterns (and relations) of value). It feeds the 
Giant, your ego and the illusion.

But to the extent that one follows Dynamic Quality, which is undefinable, one's 
behaviour is free'. (LILA, p 160)

Pirsig in the AHP tapes:'... the act of an artist,say a non- representational 
artist...he has an easel in front of him, he has paint in front of him, he has 
a brush, he puts it in and he is staring at the blank canvas...where does he 
put it? How is he going to know? Are there any rules? There are no rules! He is 
going to operate on, if he is a real artist, he's going to operate on pure 
Value. He'd say: 'There' ... and it will be a non mediated, non intellectual 
process.

This is critical: non-mediated, non-intellectual...this is following DQ. This 
is following freedom and if you want to follow this course... your 'freewill' 
and (static) 'freedom' will be determined by Quality.

I do hope I have been able to clarify some things which I believe the MOQ 
perspective is. Of course I may be wrong and will welcome your and Dan's 
comments.








Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to