On Apr 25, 2011, at 7:40 AM, X Acto wrote: > >> >>> >>> Ron: >>> But what is outside of static patterns and relations is chaos and >>> meaninglessness. It can't be anything else. >> >> >> >> Marsha: >> This statement represents world-view entrapment. It ranks up there >> with needing to have "a logical chain of meaning." Craig presents >> syllogism, I don't remember you doing so. > > Ron: > Well we are attempting to talk metaphysics and if MoQ is to expand > and flourish in western culture it is going to require a rational explanation > or it's just another kitchy new age wish fulfillment fad.
Marsha: Your comment is a defense of the status quo. > Marsha: > Oh yes, that myth that man is a rational animal does make me giggle; > it seems to me its just a way to sweep all scary conflicting experiences > under the rug. > > Ron; > Well you and Dan are proof that Man is not a rational animal. Marsha: I've taken a course in formal logic, and made a many month study by listening to conversations and even lectures by professors; it's a myth. You are perfect example. You talk as if what you say is logically presented, but it's just "rationalizing" your opinion. It's kind of like saying things are reasonable because they conform to previously held patterns of reasonableness. > and it is rather hilarious. Marsha: You often exchange words to bolster your opinion. I think that is hilarious. > because it reduces all of RMP's work to a pile of meaningless wood pulp. Marsha: Only for someone who cannot (excuse the cliche) think outside the box. > Laugh on because it is rather funny. Marsha: Your rationale has more than once lapsed into calling me an 'asshole.' That was an example of your typical rationale. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
