On Apr 26, 2011, at 7:41 PM, X Acto wrote: > Marsha: > The 'unknowable, undefinable undividable Goodness' that I spoke of is outside > of > the language's ability to explain it, because language seeks to divide, > describe > and define. With language the subject and object are created. I suggest you > might say there seem to be two types of goodness/betterness. There is the > static, measurable, judgmental type which is associated with a subject > (ego/individual), and there is an ineffable > Goodness(interconnectedness/nonduality). > > > Ron: > Marsha, I think that is the best way to put it. That was an excellent > explanation.Well done > for what it's worth.
Marsha: For all my griping, what you think does have value. Thanks for the agreement. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
