Hello Ron, On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:07 PM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote: > Ron: > All static quality is an illusion, all dynamic quality is chaos. Is chaos > freedom? > > If all static patterns migrate toward chaos, what are we saying? > > If all static patterns are a migration toward freedom, what are we saying? > > which consequences are better and more consistant? > > to say that they migrate or evolve toward betterness has more meaning, more > explanitory > power > than they evolve toward chaos. > > don't you think? > [Mary] I think that is misleading.
Betterness is a decision made by static quality. Dynamic Quality has no inherent betterness or worseness, only the context of static quality makes it so. Static quality does not migrate towards betterness with intent. Only in hindsight does it look that way. Static quality delights in the new surprise that supports existing patterns, but it does not presuppose the surprise, meaning it does not design or predefine what the surprise is to be. Most Dynamic surprises are, in fact, bad, but it knows a good thing when it sees it. It is for this reason that it appears to migrate towards betterness - all the worseness it has rejected is forgotten. Static quality defines betterness as that which supports all that has gone before. Dynamic Quality is not inherently better. Betterness depends on the static context. Therefore static quality defines betterness. Best, Mary Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
