I see the usefulness of "not this, not that" as helping us to avoid logic traps
I see it as freedom from obsessing over abstractions that do not exit
in the present moment.
It is a useful tool in recognizing the good in the now of experience.
It is helpful in avoiding "gumption traps"
But
It is no explanation. It does not yield greater explanitory power
It does not expand reason.
It is useful as a filter but W.James Pragmatic method is also a useful filter.
It is an explanation, it expands reason and it yeilds greater explanitory power
What are the consequences of choosing this or that?
If one exercises "no choice" when working on motorcycle maintenence,
then one really isn'nt working on the cycle at all because fixing it has become
a moot point. There is no longer any reason to work on it.
==============================
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
