Add: What differentiates science as an intellectual pattern rather than a social pattern?
On May 19, 2011, at 10:50 AM, MarshaV wrote: > > > On May 19, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > >> Marsha to Andre: >> >> And you do not see "impenetrable immune system to the exclusion of morals." >> a flaw, an imperfection? >> >> Andre: >> Nice try Marsha but you keep on confusing the pattern for the level which I >> think is what you are trying to get at. So many on this discuss have pointed >> this out to Bodvar over a period of fourteen odd years to no avail and you >> seem to continue it. The activity called 'science' is an intellectual >> pattern of value not to be confused with the level itself. > > > Marsha: > I am not Bo. I have stated many times my approach is different than Bo's. > For me, the fourth level is comprised of a collection of static patterns of > value that can be categorized as 'intellectual.' 'Science' is the name of a > static pattern of value, not the pattern. Why don't you described the > pattern 'science'; describe how 'making science' functions as an activity. > > The rest of your response was not applicable. It was mostly preachy filler. > > > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
