Marsha said to dmb:
What if I put it that reification (expanded definition) is a feature OF of
Intellectual patterns?
dmb says:
Wow. It's like you actually WANT people to think you're hopelessly confused.
Look, it's simple enough that a child could understand it. The idea can be
expressed in a single sentence.
Reification is NOT a feature of concepts but rather a certain kind of
misconception, a conceptual error, an abuse of concepts.
What's the difference between your view and mine? I am opposed to the abuse of
concepts. You are opposed to concepts. I am opposed to the intellect's defect.
You are opposed to the intellect. Your view of intellectual static quality is
approximately the opposite of the MOQ's. Intellectual quality is as good as it
gets, as far as static patterns go. It is subordinate to nothing except DQ,
except the immediate flux of life, direct everyday experience.
Cancer is NOT a feature of the patient but rather a danger to the patient. The
point is to save the patient, not to kill him. How can you fail to comprehend
the difference? Seriously. How is that possible? I sincerely do not understand
how anybody could be THAT confused. We're getting into Oliver Sacks territory
here, something to be explained by a neurologist.
Or is it that you're just drunk all the time? WTF?
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
