Marsha to Andre:

I am not Bo.  I have stated many times my approach is different than Bo's.   
For me, the fourth level is comprised of a collection of static patterns of 
value that can be categorized as 'intellectual.'

Andre:
Are we talking MOQ here? Marsha, I will not let fly but you are one of the 
biggest wanks I have ever come across...'a collection of patterns of value that 
can be categorized as...'. You and the MOQ simply appear not to go together. If 
and when you question-mark even the very foundations of Pirsig's MOQ you still 
need a lot to learn. And you do not deserve a place here to discuss his ideas.

Marsha:
'Science' is the name of a static pattern of value, not the pattern.

Andre:
Another indication of your warped thinking. It's a static pattern... but not 
the pattern... ? Duh!!!

Marsha:
Why don't you described the pattern 'science'; describe how 'making science' 
functions as an activity.

Andre:
Duh? Bloody hell! Science IS an activity otherwise it would not be a pattern 
you silly girl!

I am sick of this. Goodbye Marsha. You contribute nothing but silliness. And 
that is putting it mildly. And, for goodness sake do not drag your Buddhist 
lectures in here...you clearly do not even UNDERSTAND it to the degree that you 
can use it to make a sensible contribution on this Discuss with regards to 
Pirsig's MOQ. Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance...and you don't even 
understand this title. Shame on you.


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to