On 5/19/11 11:14 AM, "Andre Broersen" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip>
> Andre, (who thinks the title of this thread is rather funny, but ah, to Ham,
> anything possible):
> Yes, Quality is defined when referring to sq. But actually it is not
> defined...it is given shape through the abstracting...When you are
> intellectualizing about it.
<snip>
Hi Andre and All,
The term "Abstracting" raises all kinds of red flags for me centered in real
and intentional existence O/S. I do not see DQ as intentional existence,
and SQ as real existence.
Logic enters the picture when evolution moves from an emotional level to an
intellectual level DQ to SQ. Rather than real and intentional existence I
want to explore a hierarchy in levels in existence, evolution, inorganic,
organic, emotional, intellectual etc.
Joe
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
