On Jun 10, 2011, at 1:02 PM, david buchanan wrote:
Like the man says, and like every reasonable person knows,
metaphysics must be definable, divisible and knowable or
there isn't any metaphysics.
"Since a metaphysics is essentially a kind of dialectical definition
and since Quality is essentially outside definition, this means that
a 'Metaphysics of Quality' is essentially a contradiction in terms,
a logical absurdity." (LILA, Chapter 5)
Why, then, did the man choose to call his Quality thesis a "metaphysics"?
Did he want his acolytes to spend their time trying to resolve a
contradiction?
Just curious,
Ham
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
