On Jun 10, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Ham Priday wrote: > > > >> dmb says: >> Like the man says, and like every reasonable person knows, >> metaphysics must be definable, divisible and knowable or >> there isn't any metaphysics. >>
>> Marsha offered the RMP quote: >> "Since a metaphysics is essentially a kind of dialectical definition >> and since Quality is essentially outside definition, this means that >> a 'Metaphysics of Quality' is essentially a contradiction in terms, >> a logical absurdity." (LILA, Chapter 5) > > > Why, then, did the man choose to call his Quality thesis a "metaphysics"? > Did he want his acolytes to spend their time trying to resolve a > contradiction? > > Just curious, > Ham HI Ham, Since the quote was something I offered, I'll attempt an answer. I suggest that he was using the MoQ as a map, menu, pointing finger. But of course, only RMP may know the answer to your question. Why did you write yours? Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
