On Jun 9, 2011, at 11:18 AM, david buchanan wrote: > dmb: > To define "gravity" as the opposite of all that is non-gravity, as Marsha > did, is just convoluted nonsense. It's a pointless logic loop whereby the > term in question is twice negated so that one simply does a full circle right > back to the term without adding anything at all. It is literally > meaningless.
Marsha: The advantage I find in considering pattern-x in the form all-that-is-opposite-from-non(pattern-x) is to prevent my mind from falling into the trap of thinking some superficial, reified definition (thoughts, concepts, words or equations) is the full pattern. While definitions are important, to think a pattern is limited to any particular definition is foolish. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
