Hi Ham and all, Are emotions definable? If so place "Love", "Hate" on the plate and mince words with them. Evolution has a metaphysical base DQ/SQ. SQ is the result of evolution, DQ originates evolution. How can I know "evolution"? It feels right and is a damn good description of levels in reality. Oh I see, feelings and emotions are not reality since they are indefinable. Why do I think that ideas follow emotions?
Joe On 8/12/11 11:41 PM, "Ham Priday" <[email protected]> wrote: > In a note to Joe under another thread, Marsha said this about DQ:: > >> Mr. Pirsig stated it was unknowable, as well as indivisible and >> undefinable. That would be no-thing to know and no one to >> know it. As Dan said, it is best explained as what it is not. > > If, indeed, DQ is both indivisible and undefinable, as well as unknowable, > how can it be divided into definable patterns of static quality? And how > can our response to Dynamic Quality lead, as you say, "to greater > knowledge"? > > Surely you must see that there is a lack of clarity in the meaning and usage > of these "quality" terms. I look to you as an authority on the MoQ -- > possibly the High Priest of the Church of Reason. > > Can you provide a simple, logical answer to my questions, Dan? Or are such > answers presumed to be forever hidden in the mystical nature of Quality > itself? > > Sincere thanks, > Ham Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
