Hi MarshaV and all, In a DQ/SQ metaphysics the definition for common words changes. I do not know what language will look like when MOQ is fully accepted. For example the word "Essence" cannot mean Objective reality. In my own mind I use my first name "Joe", as DQ in me which is indefinable yet stays the same like "essence". For "person" I substitute the word "Maurer" for the description of a continuous base of my identify SQ which can be modified by DQ. Clumsy!
Joe On 8/17/11 11:02 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > Marsha: > RMP has called an autonomous self is an illusion, In Lila he states: "This > self-appointed little editor of reality is just an impossible fiction that > collapses the moment one examines it." And in Lila's Child he states that the > MoQ "denies any existence of a ³self² that is independent of inorganic, > biological, social or intellectual patterns. There is no ³self² that contains > these patterns." Statically, conventionally, and for that matter > linguistically, from any of those point-of-view, it is illusory. Call it > remnants of the subject-object point-of-view if you like. > > At least that is how I understand it. I'm not sure how far apart are our > views. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
