Hi MarshaV and all, I have no idea how the vocabulary will change when the MOQ DQ/SQ is accepted. For myself I use "Joe" as DQ. For SQ I use "Maurer" as a continuing base for morality since it has a wider acceptance than "Joe" in a family environment.
Joe On 8/17/11 11:02 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > Marsha: > RMP has called an autonomous self is an illusion, In Lila he states: "This > self-appointed little editor of reality is just an impossible fiction that > collapses the moment one examines it." And in Lila's Child he states that the > MoQ "denies any existence of a ³self² that is independent of inorganic, > biological, social or intellectual patterns. There is no ³self² that contains > these patterns." Statically, conventionally, and for that matter > linguistically, from any of those point-of-view, it is illusory. Call it > remnants of the subject-object point-of-view if you like. > > At least that is how I understand it. I'm not sure how far apart are our > views. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
