According to MOQ, there's social quality, intellectual quality and other
forms of quality. Is the MOQ itself exclusively intellectual quality?
If yes, we don't know what social quality is. It's not described in SOM.
It has only been described in Pirsig's writing, but these descriptions
cannot belong to the MOQ, because the MOQ is exclusively intellectual
quality. But according to Lila we do know what social quality is.
Therefore, there's a contradiction in Lila.
If we say that MOQ can _define_ social quality, but cannot _describe_
it, then social quality is like Dynamic Quality. But according to Lila,
social quality is static quality, and therefore describable. This also
indicates a contradiction in Lila.
If we take the position that the MOQ itself is not exclusively
intellectual quality, we do not have these contradictions. In that case
we apparently do not bar the MOQ from being inorganic, biological,
social or Dynamic, although it certainly is also intellectual.
-Tuukka
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
