The way free will relates to what we understand as DQ is in the "ability" to act differently only in reflection is it "could have" as Dan rightly points out. Now reflection certainly effects and gives power to the ability to act differently and thats the whole point of Philosophy it is the pursuit of the Good in the now of experience via reflection and this is how moral responsibilty translates into following DQ. ..Ron Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
- [MD] "Could have acted differently" v. "t... Steven Peterson
- Re: [MD] "Could have acted differently" v... Dan Glover
- Re: [MD] "Could have acted differently&quo... Steven Peterson
- Re: [MD] "Could have acted differently... X Acto
- Re: [MD] "Could have acted differe... Dan Glover
- Re: [MD] "Could have acted di... X Acto
- Re: [MD] "Could have acted di... david buchanan
- Re: [MD] "Could have acted differently... Dan Glover
- Re: [MD] "Could have acted differe... Steven Peterson
- Re: [MD] "Could have acted differently&quo... MarshaV
- [MD] Is there a contradiction in MoQ? Tuukka Virtaperko
- Re: [MD] Is there a contradiction in Mo... 118
- Re: [MD] Is there a contradiction ... Tuukka Virtaperko
