Hello everyone On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 6:13 AM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote: > > > And some of our posters hold some very rigid conceptions about "conventional" > terms. They > reject those terms on purely metaphysical reasons not Pragmatic ones. > > It's the attitude that must be rejected freinds .. the dynamism lies in > looking at each static > composite with fresh eyes, to see the new in the old, to expand understanding. > > And on this note, to Dan, perhaps the rejection of social quality and the > measuring of your > writing agaist the satisfaction it delivers to you has become a rigid static > pattern of "good" > for you and perhaps breaking those static patterns would be a real boon to > your writing. > Just a suggestion.
Hi Ron I'm not sure what you mean... are you suggesting writing gives me some sort of satisfaction? I thought I made it clear that it doesn't. I don't "want" to write so much as I am compelled to write. Are you suggesting I should pander to others and thereby measure my writing? But I don't "measure" my writing at all. I just write. If it is good, fine. If it is not, then it is not. And I do know the difference... it isn't the measure of my writing that makes it good or not... it is the writing itself. I'm not rejecting social quality. I envy those who find value in social quality. But to me, it rings false. There are times when I wish it didn't. > > peace and to you, Dan Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
