Hi Steve and All, Is there a modality revealed in the way that DQ is indefinable? I want to talk about emotions.
DQ emotions exist. A logical point of view DQ/SQ manifests in an intellectual level capable of governing DQ only emotional spontaneity. In that way I see DQ as the emotional response to reality, always indefinable, yet full of meaning, demanding a the need for action. Intellectual DQ/SQ in logical precision overrides or accepts the emotional impulse. As governor of consciousness in indefinable emotions, intellect DQ/SQ becomes the higher level in evolution. Intellect manifesting through logic is a higher level than emotions. How is logic DQ/SQ a higher manifestation than emotional reality? Emotions are real or bogus in themselves outside of logic. I can only argue about the object of love. No intellectual argument changes how I feel. I leave that to the gun, physical fear. The intellectual logic DQ/SQ forces me to reexamine my feelings for further developments creating a higher logical environment beyond the spontaneous environment at the emotional level. Joe On 9/30/11 7:02 AM, "Steven Peterson" <[email protected]> wrote: > Steve: > Given this RMP statement (and all that talk about Quality being > undefined), dmb's objections are just the sort of objections we can > _always_ make to what _anyone_ says about DQ. The only way to avoid > such objections is to shut the hell up about DQ, but then of course > dmb objects to not talking about DQ as well. But it is just absurd > from the start for dmb to claim that he has properly grasped something > in the name of DQ that you and I have missed given that "DQ" is (among > other Pirsigian usages of the term) a placeholder for what is lost as > soon as you think you have grasped it. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
