dmb,
Oh, your definition doesn't have a source. Your definition of 'relativism' is whatever you think it is. The issue is is whether truth (static patterns) is relative within the MoQ. Marsha On Nov 22, 2011, at 1:00 PM, david buchanan wrote: > > Marsha shouted at dmb: > PLEASE SUPPLY THE SOURCE FOR THE DEFINITION OF RELATIVISM (the one in the > nutshell) YOU SUPPLIED: > > > > dmb says (again): > > I gave you the definition you asked for and I showed you exactly how and > where Pirsig uses the word "relativism" in a way that fits that definition. > Since the issue is whether or not Pirsig is a relativist, what could be more > relevant and appropriate? If that's not good enough for you, then you're just > not a reasonable person. Granger's description of Pirsig's relationship to > the Sophists also supports this definition. > > Why do you always pretend to want answers that you already have and don't > really want anyway? It's boring. Go away. > > > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
