Marsha, That is a very low quality deduction IMO . Can you support it? Mark
On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:50 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > dmb, > > > Oh, your definition doesn't have a source. Your definition of 'relativism' > is whatever you think it is. The issue is is whether truth (static patterns) > is relative within the MoQ. > > > Marsha > > > > > On Nov 22, 2011, at 1:00 PM, david buchanan wrote: > >> >> Marsha shouted at dmb: >> PLEASE SUPPLY THE SOURCE FOR THE DEFINITION OF RELATIVISM (the one in the >> nutshell) YOU SUPPLIED: >> >> >> >> dmb says (again): >> >> I gave you the definition you asked for and I showed you exactly how and >> where Pirsig uses the word "relativism" in a way that fits that definition. >> Since the issue is whether or not Pirsig is a relativist, what could be more >> relevant and appropriate? If that's not good enough for you, then you're >> just not a reasonable person. Granger's description of Pirsig's relationship >> to the Sophists also supports this definition. >> >> Why do you always pretend to want answers that you already have and don't >> really want anyway? It's boring. Go away. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
