Hi Mark,
RMP:
In a subject-object metaphysics, this experience is between a pre-existing
object and subject, but in the MOQ, there is no pre-existing subject or object.
Experience and Dynamic Quality become synonymous… Experience comes first,
everything else [such as subjects and objects] comes later. This is pure
empiricism, as opposed to scientific empiricism, which, with its pre-existing
subjects and objects, is not really so pure.
(McWatt, Anthony, 'A Critical Analysis of Robert Pirsig’s Metaphysics of
Quality')
Marsha;
Do you need an interpreter? Experience is a legitimate topic in this forum.
Marsha
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 17, 2011, at 5:28 PM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Marsha,
> This is not a forum of experience, this forum is to discuss MoQ. If indeed
> your posts are just relating a personal experience, then that clarifies why
> you post the way you do. So in response to your posts I can pay your head
> and say "that's nice Marsha, thanks for sharing" and then I can get back to
> MoQ.
>
> I take it from your response that this is what you want. So I say "I am
> proud of you for believing in Emptiness" and I mean it, please carry on.
>
> Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
> Mark
>
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
