Ron,

Ron:
Any useful predicate is simple, and economical in explanation.

Tuukka:
Not true. The properties of the predicate "the truth value of the Goldbach conjecture" are extremely complicated, yet resolving it would be of some importance. Basically, if what you said here were true, any mathematics above high school level would be "not useful".

Perhaps you are suggesting, that philosophy should be simple. If this is too complicated for you, it's not for you.

Ron:
Analyzing the traditionally rationalist term of "everything that exists" or "God" or 
"reality" or any abstract
noun,  the discussion is aided by revisiting the monist/pluralist or the 
rationalist/empiricist or the "one/many"
inquires of the ancient Greeks. The Socratic dialogs of Plato and Aristotle's
"metaphysics" are a great place to start to gain a more intelligible hold on 
the issue you raise.

Tuukka:
You must have misunderstood the issue. By saying that a predicate is not useful unless it's simple you are saying mathematic research is not useful. You probably didn't mean -that-.


Ron adds:
If a "nonrelativizably used predicate" is essentially the same as what is known 
grammatically as an "abstract noun"
then you are simply trying to solve a problem that doesn't really exist with a 
kind of overcomplicated term
that does not offer a better, more simplified, easily understandable 
explanation.

Tuukka:
A predicate is not the same thing as an abstract noun. They are not required to be abstract. "Concept" would be a more correct intuitively appealing designation.

I don't insist on using unappealing language. My work may be regarded as a work in progress, and as such, names of things can be changed. But I am currently using the name "nonrelativizably used predicate", because it is the technically correct name for that thing, from a mathematical point of view. Feel free to suggest a better name for more casual use! Not everyone is an analytic philosopher.

Best wishes,
Tuukka
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to