All I'm saying Arlo, is that I don't read the MoQ as a map. I read the MoQ as a compass. I'll make my own map, thank you. I don't expect anyone else will find it useful. It's not designed to be useful to anyone else. My map is strictly for me.
On Apr 18, 2012, at 1:29 PM, Arlo Bensinger <[email protected]> wrote: > [John] > The "objective " truth is the MoQ as described by Pirsig, eh? Hogwash! > > [Arlo] > Pirsig did not "describe the MOQ", what he described was Quality, and he > called his description "The Metaphysics OF Quality". > > Is Pirsig's description "objective truth"? Of course not. Asking whether > Pirsig is "true" and Peirce is "false" is like the polar/Cartesian coordinate > example used in LILA. One may be 'better', depending on what you are trying > to do. > > If you have a better map, John, by all means, share it. If others find your > map better than Pirsig's, I'm sure it will get used. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
