Dave, > > There are two separate questions. > > 1) What does Pirsig mean? >
Betterness (value) is fundamental > 2) Is Pirsig right? > Yes. > The second question can't really be raised until the first one has been > answered pretty well. Pretty well? You mean all the commas counted? The whole thing sliced, diced and thoroughly intellectually analyzed? I think the MoQ is a pretty nifty tool for avoiding static traps. Methinks you're mainly concerned with turning it into a static trap. You got the impulses of a priest, dave, and this your religion > > This is just a matter of logical necessity because one cannot test, dispute, > affirm, refine or criticize an idea unless and until you understand what it > means. > > The truth of Pirsig's claims can be tested or scrutinized ONLY if you know > what those claims are. Obviously. > > The attempts to be clear about what Pirsig is and is not saying are bizarrely > construed as oppressive dogmatism or an evil static trap. > > Why in the world would we NOT want to know what Pirsig means? > > What is the point and purpose of this discussion group? > > If you don't really care what he thinks, why bother hanging out here? > > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
