Hi Joe, The context for my comment was quite an indictment of the intellect's shortcomings by Schopenhauer. I think, though, that the value can be improved if the dualism implied by knowledge-of-some-thing is understood and remains as hypothetical. The MoQ is afterall a monism (with Quality the source of all that exists.) At its highest, static (patterned) quality may represent the best value available at the moment, but it does have its fallibilities At least, imho.
Marsha p.s. I have always considered RMP an open heart surgeon. On Jun 24, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Marsha > > Some things that I know yesterday (Passage of time) I question today! > DQ(instantaneous)/SQ(delay)! Singularity/duality! DQ/SQ not DQ and SQ. > There is duality in my experience. I do not create the metaphysics DQ/SQ as > differing entities. I accepy duality in the existing intellect. DQ > indefinable/SQ definable. Two not one. My experience is my emotions DQ > (self) and my intellect SQ (time). I AM that I AM???? > > Joe > > > > On 6/24/12 5:24 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Little ole me: >> I think it better to prefer 'not this; not that' - mental white noise - the >> unknowable, indivisible and undefinable. But then, I do like to dance. >> :-). > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
