Hello Joe, I think your understanding is wonderful! I've never denied the importance of static quality. I am not comatose. I am a static girl, living in a static world like everyone else. I have created my own two-level approach to static (patterned) value and a neat little definition; it's not like I've ignored static quality, or evolution. And I've even used words. !!! But under it all, the fundamental nature of sq is DQ.
I am happy for your have a humble opinion. Marsha On Jun 25, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Marsha and All, > > How do we know "all that exists"? > Pirsig describes the experience of reality as DQ/SQ, indefinable/definable > reality. > > I conceptualize a manifestation of the differences in species, as evolution, > a manifestation of levels in existence. > > Indefinable DQ is individual perception. Definable SQ is evolved conception, > the individual in its origin. > > How we know follows metaphysics. SOM suggests we know by abstraction. > > IMHO MOQ accepts the direct experience of evolving/evolved reality DQ/SQ. > Metaphysics describes levels of existence in indefinable DQ/definable SQ > individuality. > > > On 6/25/12 12:30 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The MoQ is afterall a monism (with Quality the source of all that exists.) > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
