Hi Ant McWatt, Ham, and All, I am interested in Pirsig's thought process leading to a proposal of a metaphysics of knowing an indefinable DQ and Definable SQ. It can't be only by usage since we are discussing metaphysics as definition not physics as reality. Psychology is a branch of physics
The stretch in the psychological format, DQ as indefinable, was suggested by Pirsig. I experience an indefinable. How? For metaphysics DQ is acceptable. For physics DQ is acceptable only as metaphor or analogy without changing the description of evolution. I experience the indefinable. IMHO discrete levels in existence, evolution, are logically necessary for an analogouslike metaphysics of an indefinable DQ/SQ. Joe On 7/3/12 8:59 AM, "Ant McWatt" <[email protected]> wrote: > Ham Priday continued: > > The "monism" you are looking for is Ultimate Reality, from which Value is > differentiated by human sensibility. > > Ant McWatt comments: > > And, therefore out of the MOQ, out of the remit of this Discussion group and > back in conventional Western philosophology! Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
