An American businessman was visiting a Mexican coastal village and 
encountered a fisherman on the dock. He had just unloaded his stash of tuna for 
the day, and the businessman asked him how long it took him to catch them. 

The fisherman said, “Just a little while.” 

  The businessman then asked why he didn’t stay out longer and catch more, to 
which the fisherman responded he didn’t need more. He had caught enough for his 
family’s needs. 

  “But what do you do now, with all the rest of your time?” asked the 
businessman. 

  “I take a nap, I play with my children, take siesta with my wife, Maria, and 
I walk to the village in the evening, sip a little wine, and play music with my 
friends,” said the fisherman. 

  The American scoffed. “I am a Harvard MBA and could help you. You should 
spend more time fishing and with the proceeds buy a bigger boat. With the 
proceeds from the bigger boat, you could buy a fleet of boats and open your own 
cannery. You would control the product, processing, and distribution. You would 
need to leave this small village and move to Mexico City, then Los Angeles, and 
eventually New York, where you would run your expanding enterprise.” 

  When the fisherman asked how long all that would take, the businessman said, 
“Fifteen to twenty years. And then you could sell your company stock to the 
public and become a millionaire.” 

  “But what then?” asked the fisherman. 

  “Then you could retire, move to a coastal fishing village, fish a little, nap 
a lot, play with your kids, enjoy time with your wife, and go to the village at 
night to play music with your friends.”


This is an example of how our assumptions tumble out of us, beckoned or not. We 
enter into a situation, assess it from our own personal worldview, and 
generously offer suggestions for improvement that were never invited in the 
first place. In The Fifth Discipline, Peter Senge writes: “Mental models are 
deeply ingrained assumptions that influence how we understand the world and how 
we take action. We do not “have” mental models. We “are” our mental models…The 
discipline of working with mental models starts with turning the mirror inward; 
learning to unearth our internal pictures of the world, to bring them to the 
surface and hold them rigorously to scrutiny.”


(Phillips, Jan, 'The Art of Original Thinking – The Making of a Thought Leader')

http://www.janphillips.com/downloads/ArtofOriginalThinking.pdf 


Marsha:
I see "mental models" very close to "static patterns of value".  The last 
sentence in the above also sets forward a working solution.  It is not to 
merely accept the thoughts flowing through our consciousness as 'real' or 
'true', (whether that be a "creative self", "the pragmatic theory of truth" or  
"truth is an idea which represents experience beautifully").  That's the NAIVE 
reality accepted by human beings that Lila points to in Chapter 14.  I'll take 
holding static pattens of value as hypothetical (supposed but not neccesarily 
real or true) any day of the week, rather than be one that would act 
destructively to prove their world-view to be the "correct one" and use foece 
to have everyone else accept it.  It's analogy, boys, merely analogy; you do 
not hold some objective truth.  You talk about the MoQ's new conception of 
truth, yet defend it like it is absolute.  
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to