Hi David and All, IMHO there is no way to conceptualize DQ! SQ is conceptualized in definition. DQ is the experience of the individual. Through communication of not this not that a logic for existence can be agreed upon by two people. Friendship values this logical agreement.
The realization by communication that another experiences reality as I do creates an imaginary unbreakable chain for logical DQ and we can communicate somewhat with each other through our common beliefs. DQ remains indefinable in logical discourse. After all we both have a mother and a father. If logic were able to create a chain then MOQ would be logical like mathematics and would lose its metaphysical status. As it happens DQ remains indefinable and knowable in individual experience. A consensus vigorously challenged describes metaphysics MOQ. Metaphysics has a history in eternity. Joe On 9/25/12 3:34 PM, "david buchanan" <[email protected]> wrote: > This isn't David. You strike me as a very decent and sincere guy. But that > doesn't mean that it's okay to hold opinions on philosophers you've never read > and it's not okay to put words in the other guy's mouth. It's not okay to > confuse topics or ignore the context in which these claims are made. That's > just not good enough. Errors like that will shut down a conversation faster > than you can say "fallacious reasoning". Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
