Joe,
To remind you:
"To the extent that one's behavior is controlled by static patterns of quality
it is without choice. But to the extent that one follows Dynamic Quality, which
is undefinable, one's behavior is free."
(RMP, LILA, Chapter 12)
Joe, what do you want of me?
Marsha
On Jan 5, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi MarshaV and All,
>
> I am at a loss for words! DQ/SQ metaphysics seems to abhor words. The
> individual experiences the indefinable. There is no out front individuality
> in an individual, he/she acts with judgment like everyone else.
>
> DQ/SQ is a proper metaphysics. How alone am I wrestling with an
> indefinable? One of millions!
>
> Let us keep the indefinable in a special metaphysics! This becomes
> translated into I am special and I control an army to prove it. A bigger
> army is no better proof! Would that the army of two suffice! She made me
> eat the apple!
>
> Joe
>
>
> On 1/4/13 10:48 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> p.s. Amazement is a noun. How objective is that?
>
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
