Greetings Joe,

I do not understand you response.  What do you want of me?
 
 
Marsha


On Jan 6, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi MarshaV,
> 
> Joe, what do you want of me?
> 
> WOW!  
> 
> Dynamic!
> 
> Joe
> 
> On 1/6/13 1:18 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Joe,
>> 
>> To remind you:
>> 
>> "To the extent that one's behavior is controlled by static patterns of
>> quality it is without choice. But to the extent that one follows Dynamic
>> Quality, which is undefinable, one's behavior is free."
>>      (RMP, LILA, Chapter 12)
>> 
>> Joe, what do you want of me?
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 5, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi MarshaV and All,
>>> 
>>> I am at a loss for words!  DQ/SQ metaphysics seems to abhor words.  The
>>> individual experiences the indefinable.  There is no out front individuality
>>> in an individual, he/she acts with judgment like everyone else.
>>> 
>>> DQ/SQ is a proper metaphysics.  How alone am I wrestling with an
>>> indefinable?  One of millions!
>>> 
>>> Let us keep the indefinable in a special metaphysics!  This becomes
>>> translated into I am special and I control an army to prove it.  A bigger
>>> army is no better proof!  Would that the army of two suffice!  She made me
>>> eat the apple!
>>> 
>>> Joe 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 1/4/13 10:48 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> p.s.  Amazement is a noun.  How objective is that?
>> 
 
,

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to