On 1/7/13 1:21 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Greetings Joe,
>
> I do not understand you response. What do you want of me?
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
> On Jan 6, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi MarshaV,
>>
>> Joe, what do you want of me?
>>
>> WOW!
>>
>> Dynamic!
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> On 1/6/13 1:18 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Joe,
>>>
>>> To remind you:
>>>
>>> "To the extent that one's behavior is controlled by static patterns of
>>> quality it is without choice. But to the extent that one follows Dynamic
>>> Quality, which is undefinable, one's behavior is free."
>>> (RMP, LILA, Chapter 12)
>>>
>>> Joe, what do you want of me?
>>>
>>>
>>> Marsha
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 5, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi MarshaV and All,
>>>>
>>>> I am at a loss for words! DQ/SQ metaphysics seems to abhor words. The
>>>> individual experiences the indefinable. There is no out front
>>>> individuality
>>>> in an individual, he/she acts with judgment like everyone else.
>>>>
>>>> DQ/SQ is a proper metaphysics. How alone am I wrestling with an
>>>> indefinable? One of millions!
>>>>
>>>> Let us keep the indefinable in a special metaphysics! This becomes
>>>> translated into I am special and I control an army to prove it. A bigger
>>>> army is no better proof! Would that the army of two suffice! She made me
>>>> eat the apple!
>>>>
>>>> Joe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/4/13 10:48 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> p.s. Amazement is a noun. How objective is that?
>>>
>
> ,
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
