Hi MarshaV and All, "What do you want of me?"
Given the widespread acceptance of SOM, DQ/SQ is a lonely experience. I want your realization that indefinable DQ can be experienced by the individual separately from SQ. "What do you want of me?" I want your realization that indefinable DQ is experienced in the consciousness of reality by the individual sentient! I want you to be secure in the logic for those two observations. SOM metaphysics for those sentences require that individuality be definable and that existence is a duality, real and intentional (secure only in knowledge). Indefinable DQ/SQ manifests the aspect of indefinable individuality, a contradiction only in mathematics not metaphysics. I can't answer your question "what do you want of me?" You are indefinable DQ and I have little experience with acceptable adjectives common to our experience so that I can appeal to our experience. I don't know you that intimately. My wish is that your experience of indefinable reality be fulfilling rather than obfuscating. Joe On 1/7/13 1:21 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Greetings Joe, > > I do not understand you response. What do you want of me? > > > Marsha > > > On Jan 6, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi MarshaV, >> >> Joe, what do you want of me? >> >> WOW! >> >> Dynamic! >> >> Joe >> >> On 1/6/13 1:18 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Joe, >>> >>> To remind you: >>> >>> "To the extent that one's behavior is controlled by static patterns of >>> quality it is without choice. But to the extent that one follows Dynamic >>> Quality, which is undefinable, one's behavior is free." >>> (RMP, LILA, Chapter 12) >>> >>> Joe, what do you want of me? >>> >>> >>> Marsha >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jan 5, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi MarshaV and All, >>>> >>>> I am at a loss for words! DQ/SQ metaphysics seems to abhor words. The >>>> individual experiences the indefinable. There is no out front >>>> individuality >>>> in an individual, he/she acts with judgment like everyone else. >>>> >>>> DQ/SQ is a proper metaphysics. How alone am I wrestling with an >>>> indefinable? One of millions! >>>> >>>> Let us keep the indefinable in a special metaphysics! This becomes >>>> translated into I am special and I control an army to prove it. A bigger >>>> army is no better proof! Would that the army of two suffice! She made me >>>> eat the apple! >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> >>>> On 1/4/13 10:48 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> p.s. Amazement is a noun. How objective is that? >>> > > , > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
