Marsha What can be said?
I think this is what Lila (and ZAMM) is about. Also, I wrote a book called "Money and the Art of Losing Control", which you have read twice, at least. In that book there are numerous of hints to how to understand Dynamic Quality. Excellence is an act of balance, therefore DQ is impossible to define in any other way than trying to stay on the line as long as possible. It is an act of balance in three aspects of DQ; Amount, Form and Interaction. Yes, these are Static patterns but they stem from different aspects OF Dynamic Quality. 1. Dynamic Quality IS, as we can prove its Impact upon Static Quality. DQ is just enough, too, or SQ will expand or diminish. 2. DQ has Form as it causes Differences, different Values, different static patterns, both this and that as it is impossible to define completely.... 3. DQ Interacts with SQ or there would be no experience at all. DQ creates (and destroys) static patterns at the inorganic level. DQ creates (and destroys) static patterns at the organic level. DQ creates (and destroys) static patterns at the social level. DQ creates (and destroys) static patterns at the intellectual level. Rock stars and political ideas come and go. Polticians who doesn't know the difference between organic and social values tend to choose the wrong tool to maintain their society. Motorcycle repair men who doesn't know the difference between material and social qualities appear quite odd to the customer. Contributors to this forum (MD) with a lack of humbleness tend to be seriously beaten literally, but words doesn't hurt, or? I think pottery is fine quality excercise. It's heavy but not too heavy, it's plastic and hard, and it can be used. 1,2, 3. Best wishes JanAnders 20 mar 2013 kl. 08.44 MarshaV wrote: > > Hi J-A, > > I am not saying anything about that which is "indivisible, undefinable & > unknowable". I, personally, wouldn't label it 'experience' either; though it > is present in every experience. I understand Dynamic Quality to represent > the non-dualistic. And what can be said of the non-dualistic? What can be > said of what is beyond the recognition of the five senses and mind? Not > this, not that... > > > Marsha > > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 3:14 AM, Jan Anders Andersson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Marsha, >> >> Do you mean with that last sentence that Dynamic Quality is also beyond >> morals? >> >> J_A >> >> >> 17 mar 2013 kl. 10.40 skrev MarshaV: >> >>> >>> J-A, >>> >>> As I see it, if you are asking if the static (patterned) value projected >>> onto Dynamic Quality is low or high, I would say that it is so relative to >>> the context grounding the event. In one context the static value may be >>> judged (by a human being) as high, in another context the static value may >>> be judged as low. Either way, the Dynamic Quality remains indivisible, >>> undefinable & unknowable and beyond judgements. >>> >>> >>> Marsha >>> >>> On Mar 17, 2013, at 5:23 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Machinery (inorganic) wins over nature (organic), but the machinery uses >>>> more exergy to cut the vegetation than it takes to grow so I think nature >>>> will win eventually. >>>> >>>> Besides, it looks terrible after these machines have passed by, it doesn't >>>> cut but crushes the grass and trees. All the leftovers are leaved to rot >>>> on the surface so instead of driving in the green you get the feeling of >>>> running along a dirt track. >>>> >>>> Is that of high or low dynamic quality? >>>> >>>> J A >>>> >>>> 17 mar 2013 kl. 09:10 skrev MarshaV <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> You cannot please all the people all the time, so let's try this >>>>> technological quality: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/embed/L3j6HaAieEU?rel=0 >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
