Dan said to Marsha:

I guess I don't see where you're going with this. Water isn't distinct from 
ice. Water IS ice. It is simply in a solid state rather than a liquid. 
Inorganic patterns like water change structure according to the ambient 
surroundings. Think iron: its melting point is much higher than water. But it 
is still iron in either state.
On the other hand, static quality is distinct from Dynamic Quality by 
definition. Static quality emerges from Dynamic Quality. To say 'the 
fundamental nature of static quality is Dynamic Quality' seems confusing rather 
than enlightening, in my opinion. Isn't the fundamental nature of static 
quality its definition?


dmb says:
That's right. I think Lucy is use of the McGilchrist quote only undermines the 
MOQ's central distinction. "Crazy" is such a strong word. Let's just say she's 
conceptually promiscuous. It's so fuzzy you can't really make anything out AND 
it invites an all-too-easy materialistic misinterpretation of the 
static/Dynamic split, wherein metaphysical terms are inappropriately used to 
describe physical states. You can see very common error in David Morey's 
response to that quote...


David Morey said:
I love this quote. And it is when we experience changes like ice changing to 
water then it becomes pretty clear what DQ is all about, and that water is more 
dynamic than ice, and that is more static than water. ...


dmb says:
Water and ice are okay as analogies, maybe. But if static quality is everything 
in the encyclopedia and both of them (water and ice) are definable and both of 
them are included in the encyclopedia, then they're both static in the MOQ's 
sense of the word. Pirsig says that Dynamic Quality is the cutting of 
experience and static quality is conceptual, ideas, abstractions, thoughts, the 
products of reflection, etc.. I don't see how it could make any sense to say 
that water is the cutting edge of experience or how it could make any sense to 
say that ice is a product of reflection. I mean, this is a matter of confusing 
the metaphysics of substance with the metaphysics of Quality.

 




"Water is distinct from ice, but in the ice cube it is present: not as a fly 
might be trapped there, but _in the very ice_.  And yet when the ice cube is 
gone, the water remains.  Although we see water as ice, we do so not because it 
is there separately, to be seen from behind or apart from the cube." (Iain 
McGilchrist, 'The MASTER and his EMISSARY: The Divided Brain and the Making of 
the Western World', p. 452).
                                          
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to