Yes my reply is coming.. Held up with things at the moment. Best case another fortnight.. But I do still intend on responding..
On 13/04/2013, at 1:44 PM, Dan Glover <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello everyone > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Hamilton Priday <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi David (Harding), Dan, Ron, and All -- >> >> I realize this is a topic that was chewed over during the first quarter of >> this year, and dropped without resolution. > > > Hi Ham > > Dropped? Has it been dropped? Who told you it has been dropped? I don't > think so as I am awaiting a response from David H. on my last two > contributions. Sometimes it takes us a while to get around to answering > each other. Or maybe it has been dropped. It takes two to tango, as they > say... time will tell. > > >> But it's critical to understanding the MoQ, as well as metaphysics itself. >> This is one of those cases where clarification is needed from a source >> outside the Discuss group, and am happy to volunteer, despite the fact that >> nobody seems to care about what I say. > > > Dan: > I would love to hear what you have to say, if it pertains to the MOQ. > Otherwise... > > >> (Maybe that gives me an advantage.) > > Dan: > How is not understanding what we are supposed to be discussing an advantage? > > Anyway, I don't see that you've added any commentary on what was said. Not > sure of the meaning of this but if you do care to comment, please know I am > all ears, or all eyes, as the case may be. > > Thank you, > > Dan > > http://www.danglover.com > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
